Yeah, Michael, it’s about swimming…and the water may be unclear and there may be sharks out there…and you may want to get into a boat and do some fishing instead of swimming…we have lots of options…as we can choose and interpret…and MAKE A DECISION…about so many things…
And what happened, Mark, right before you posted this video from the Joe Rogan show?
And what do you want to direct our attention to?
I find this Joe Rogan show is a mess!
I like the idea of a spot light on Graham Hancock but after viewing a few minutes of this video I felt exhausted and hopeless and ready to pull the plug. This was what I would call the opposite of a coherent ‘we’ space. I actually felt this is what I have tried my best to protect this forum from becoming. A lot of white guys interrupting each other. expressing no curiosity or concern, for the other or for learning something. I learned nothing from this display of bad communication. This is an excellent example of what happens when you get sucked into the Drama Triangle.
Can we frame a coherent conversation about Lost Civilazations and Archeology? Maybe. I would welcome that opportunity.
Maybe we could start with Plato. This is where Hancock starts. In the Timeus Plato reports on the ancient myth. It really give us insights into the Mythic/Mental Mind(s).
If anyone wants to stage a civilized discourse event, where Ancient Archeology and Remote Viewing is investigated, I would be very interested and offer support. We could also look at Graham Hancock in videos where he is more coherent, in friendly company. As his ideas are more challenging (as he has little academic support but a couple of best sellers) he is probably an interesting fellow to watch and listen to with great care and concern I see little point in going into rabbit holes without end. We could surf different streams and develop some adjacent possibilities. I like the weird and the uncanny. I also like coherence and clarity of intent.
Here is a remote viewing performance revealing hidden architecture/archeology. I find this a more coherent direction to go in than getting caught up in shouting matches. Is it possible that we could create conditions for break through rather than break down or endless rabbit holes to nowhere?
I appreciate, Mark, that you want to push boundaries but which boundaries and in what direction?
Who wants to start?