While I understand your enthusiasm here, I’m politely skeptical (as we curmudgeons often are): different media, different messages, Mr. McLuhan might say. I found it a very powerful novel; well worth the time spent, but so full of tree lore that I wonder how effectively it could be condensed into a couple of hours of visually heavy presentation … but, hey, what is creativity for? I found it noteworthy that Suzanne Simard, to whom @MarcoMasi linked us in the Wholeness of Nature 5 thread, was very likely the model for Overstory’s Patricia Westerford.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cosmos Café [2021-04-15]: The Wholeness of Nature 3 | 16 | 1214 | April 24, 2021 | |
| Cosmos Café [2021-03-18]: The Wholeness of Nature 1 | 11 | 1167 | March 20, 2021 | |
| Cosmos Café [2021-04-01]: The Wholeness of Nature 2 | 8 | 1222 | July 6, 2021 | |
| Cosmos Café [2021-04-29]: The Wholeness of Nature 4 | 30 | 1994 | May 12, 2021 | |
| Cosmos Café: Gebser's "Grammatical Mirror" [2018.03.13] | 57 | 6642 | July 2, 2018 |