Kate,
Thank you ever so much for the detailed portrayal of your situation. You had mentioned your living part-time in the Czech Republic, and of course, as an ex-pat myself and knowing any number of different flavors of ex-pats over the years, one develops a notion of what “living abroad” means. It’s always very different in detail, which is why I appreciate you having straightened out the picture that was hanging on my mental wall.
Rules for residency vary greatly from one EU country to another. Even though I had had a permanent residency visa the first time I lived here in Germany. It was a long process of temporary visas, then a permanent one; what helped, of course, is that I had a contract with a German school and was paying into the healthcare and social-security systems. Having married a German citizen accelerated the process only slightly, but it had a positive effect on decision making. That all went away six months after when we moved to CA in 1983. Being ignorant as I am so often in life, I didn’t realize that it might have been possible to maintain a residency in Germany during that time (due to laws on how one may register such with local authorities) and everything would have picked up where it left off upon our return in 1997, but such was not the case, and I had to start all over again.
Some of the rules changed during our absence, and when I first applied again for a residency visa, I “was read the riot act” by the young civil servant in Stuttgart who made it clear that if I lost my job in the first year here, I’d be deported. I didn’t, so I wasn’t, but when I renewed my US passport in 2006 (the visa was stamped in my passport), my wife was required to come to the Immigration Office to countersign the receipt. It was only in 2016 that I was granted a permanent-resident permit, allowing me to stay here and not requiring my wife to countersign anymore.
Of course, the point of this overlong digression is simply to highlight how tricky the negotiation of residency status can be. I have not idea how the Czechs handle it, but I can well imagine that it is anything but simple. Moreover, the rules for EU citizens are much more lenient than for those of us who are non-EU aliens. Due to my own personal experience, you can understand that I may have developed some very strong views on citizenship and residency “rights” (if I may use the term). I sympathize deeply with your situation, and empathize intensely with your plight. I was fortunate, but I am also keenly aware that the slightest deviation from the “set path” can cause one to end up in an absolutely Kafkan limbo that one never imagined possible. The pandemic has added another dimension to the insanity to say the least.
The pandemic has changed more things than most of us are comfortable acknowledging, but your approach to teaching visual arts online is a noble and worthy undertaking. Being one of the most visual-arts-challenged people on the planet (which Johnny can attest to: he’s tried more than once to coax something out of me in various CCafés without much success), I’m in no position to make any kind of meaningful assessment, but I felt more comfortable with what you are doing in your introductory videos than anything I ever experienced in school. I’m an (almost fanatical) advocate of flipping the curriculum in primary and secondary schools; that is, starting with art (in all it forms) and then moving toward math and science (whereby much of the latter could be “snuck into” the former in a meaningful but unobtrusive way). I sincerely hope that many of those you are speaking to hear you.
Heh, heh, heh … very kindly put.
It is very clear to me that much is not right with the world, and hasn’t been for quite some time (most of our unwritten and written history?). I may be overstating my case, but that’s the curmudgeon speaking. I also firmly believe that we moderns have gotten ourselves into a particularly dangerous pickle, and it’s not going to be easy for us to get out of it without wreaking a lot of havoc and causing one helluva lot of damage. (But even so, the hermeticist still hopes.) Nevertheless, I also think that we have everything we need to accomplish the feat, whether we realize it or not. And that’s part of the “problem”: too few realize and recognize that the world in which we live is in large part of our making; consequently, we have the wherewithal to make it different, but we may not have the will.
What disturbs be overall is the lack of anything resembling critical thinking skills in wide swaths of the population. I agree: we have been fed primarily on a steady diet of corporate and special interests, but it was possible to sift, sort, choose, and extract what was the kernels of “truth” in that diet. With the advent of the internet and the Googles and Facebooks of this world, the situation changed drastically. Not only did the selection of facts and information shift, the algorithms these entities created distorted that selection in unimaginable ways. Consensus reality was indeed faulty and fragile, but it was an agreed starting point, and that, too, has gone away. What we’re left with, generally speaking, is only distrust. Even if you have the critical faculties needed to negotiate the world today, it is getting ever more difficult to trust anyone or anything, including one’s own reason.
So, building on what I heard Marco saying in his insightful and hopeful post, what “we” (read: everybody, whether they like it or not) has to do is build trust. I don’t know how that is done on a massive scale; I only know how hard it is at a personal level. Being not only a hermeticist and curmudgeon, I’m also a fool and I bring a sound portion of trust to every encounter I have with another human being. As the curmudgeon can attest: the vast majority of these encounters are not dissatisfying, they are downright disappointing. That bothers me a lot less now than it used to. But where trust can be sown, the fruits thereof can be grown. Some harvests are more bountiful than others, it goes without saying.
Truth be told, I have no patience for anything that smacks of conspiracy. Modern human beings are not a very cooperative sort. Oh sure, you can get just about anyone to do anything with the right incentives, but to do so overtime in cooperation with other individuals is an impossible challenge. They have to deal with distrust every bit as much as everyone else. That’s what I think drives modern “tribalism”, to use a shorthand term for a pseudophenomenon: for all our self-proclaimed individualism, most people I know what to belong to some kind of group, maybe any kind so as not to be alone anymore. It used to be the Masons or the bowling league or a neighborhood card club, but today, they are more often megachurches or militias or gangs or wings of a particular political party. What appears to outsiders as monolithic is, I’m sure, when seen from within, more likely a rather rickety conglomeration of wannabe. But that doesn’t really matter: belonging is belonging. We have to deal with everyone from where they are, whether we like it or not or whether we like where they are or not.
What this means, then, that I have to take every encounter I have with another as a singular and unique event. Even in those cases, say within the family, where I know that a certain degree of trust has been attained, it is nevertheless put to the test each time anew. But even there the lines of development are not straight, but zig-zagged. Outside the family, in the public sphere, well, mileage varies significantly. 'Tis a tedious process … and time-consuming to boot, but for the moment, I don’t have a better plan.